Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

NIH cuts could affect hundreds of medical studies at Mayo Clinic and University of Minnesota

A preliminary estimate by education policy analyst James Murphy finds that the U stands to lose around $62 million annually under the new formula, while Mayo Clinic would lose about $54 million.

Mayo Clinic Statues
Feith Family Statuary Park in downtown Rochester is the current home of the "My Brother and I" statue of Drs. William and Charles Mayo by Tuck Langland. According to a statement from Mayo Clinic, they plan to relocate the statue to a space between the east entrances to the Mayo and Gonda buildings to make way for construction as part of the "Bold. Forward. Unbound. in Rochester" project. The statue is pictured Friday, Sept. 6, 2024.
Joe Ahlquist / Post Bulletin

MINNEAPOLIS — Minnesota and 21 other states have sued the National Institutes of Health over the Trump administration’s steep cuts to grants that fund medical research in the United States.

If those cuts are implemented, “cutting edge work to cure and treat human disease will grind to a halt,” the attorneys general wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

The cuts involve “indirect costs,” which are the expenses of maintaining the laboratories, computer services, staffing and other administrative overhead of academic research. Institutions currently negotiate these costs individually with the federal government.

The NIH’s average indirect cost rate typically runs around 28%, meaning that every dollar of direct research funding is accompanied by 28 additional cents in indirect funding. The new order would cap that rate at 15%, effectively slashing NIH indirect payments in half.

In Minnesota, Mayo Clinic and the University of Minnesota are the chief recipients of NIH research grants. A preliminary estimate by education policy analyst James Murphy finds that the U stands to lose around $62 million annually under the new formula, while Mayo Clinic would lose about $54 million.

Other Minnesota institutions receiving NIH funding include hospitals, private companies doing medical research, and the Fond du Lac Indian Reservation, according to NIH reports. All told, Minnesota entities stand to lose around $117 million a year, according to Murphy’s estimates.

“The NIH funds critical research into fighting chronic and catastrophic disease in every corner of our country,” Attorney General Keith Ellison said in a statement. “Its work has an impact on countless families across America and helps keep us healthy and extend our lives.”

Rebecca Cunninghan, president of the University of Minnesota, wrote in a letter to colleagues that the cuts are a “direct attack” on the university’s mission, and that they will “slow and limit medical breakthroughs that cure cancer and address chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease.”

The NIH website lists more than 659 University of Minnesota projects funded by the grants in fiscal year 2024. They include research into organ transplantation; elderly patients’ ability to fight off infections; the prevalence of blood cancers in Minnesota; Parkinson’s disease treatments; and immunotherapy treatments for certain types of cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

a11daf-20230714-medicalcenter01-webp1400.jpg
University of Minnesota leaders say they are still interested in a deal with Fairview on the University of Minnesota Medical Center and the proposed reorganization is separate from that.
Kerem Yücel / MPR News

The grants also fund hundreds of studies at Mayo Clinic, which in recent years have included research into treatments for degenerative brain disease, breast cancer, osteoporosis, kidney disease and diabetes.

“NIH is obligated to carefully steward grant awards to ensure taxpayer dollars are used in ways that benefit the American people and improve their quality of life,” the agency said in the statement announcing the cuts.

Ellison has also joined lawsuits against the Trump administration’s executive orders on gender-affirming care, birthright citizenship, and overall federal funding.

This story was originally published on MinnesotaReformer.com

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.

Conversation

ADVERTISEMENT

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT