ST. PAUL — The Minnesota House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee held a hearing on Tuesday, July 8, where representatives grilled Department of Human Services leadership on Medicaid fraud and how the agency oversees it.
DHS currently oversees $18.5 billion in Medicaid dollars, also known as Medical Assistance in Minnesota, according to Minnesota Management and Budget. Of the $18.5 billion, there is a 2.2% rate of improper payments, DHS Inspector General James Clark said Monday. He said the improper payment rate does not equal cases of prosecuted fraud, which he said is roughly 100 annually.
ADVERTISEMENT
Clark said Tuesday that part of the discussion with Medicaid fraud oversight in the DHS’ Inspector General’s Office and the Attorney General’s Office is a lack of resources. Clark said his office has roughly 400 employees but only about 40 overseeing the 988 open investigations of Medicaid mispayment.
“When you think about the amount of resources that would be needed … to really oversee a $20 billion program, you have to think about whether or not the Attorney General’s Office has the amount of resources it needs, and also whether DHS OIG has the amount of resources it needs,” he said. “$20 billion is a lot for us to ... be in charge of and safeguard.”
Rep. Isaac Schultz, R-Elmdale Township, asked DHS on Tuesday why Minnesota spends roughly $20 billion on Medicaid if larger states like Colorado spend $13 billion.
“At the end of the day here … what Republicans are championing is the idea that there’s a dignity of work, and if you’re an able-bodied adult, that you should be contributing to our economy … and the bill that just passed in Washington is all about ensuring that able-bodied adults — people who look just like me and many of us around this table — that they’re contributing to our society,” Schultz said. “So we need to take a look at Minnesota.”
The hearing came days after President Donald Trump signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill” on Friday, July 4, including changes to Medicaid eligibility, such as increased work requirements.
Clark clarified on Tuesday that counties, not the state, check individual eligibility requirements that will be affected by the passage of the bill — the state checks providers.
“I think it’s undisputed that the issue of Medicaid fraud that we are concerned about is not an individual eligibility issue, it is a provider issue,” Rep. Emma Greenman, DFL-Minneapolis, said Tuesday. “We’re all trying to figure out these new changes that are coming down the pipe.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Matt Freeman, with the Association of Minnesota Counties, said Tuesday the federal changes to Medicaid could both increase workload for counties to verify eligibility and that counties are “expecting” additional costs to potentially be offset by property tax increases.
Roughly could lose Medicaid as a result of the adjustments, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. a net cost of $500 million annually to the state in lost federal funding.
DHS Temporary Commissioner Shireen Gandhi said Tuesday that a large portion of Minnesota’s roughly $20 billion Medicaid budget has to do with who is covered, which she said is 60% elderly and disabled.
“One of the things that we have been proud of in Minnesota is the quality of life for people with disabilities that we are able to afford,” she said. “We have waivers in place that allow people to live in community and to thrive. And if you look at our rankings across the country, we are at the top by a far margin. So in terms of spending, that’s where the largest amount of dollars go.”
Fraud emerged as a large focus for Republicans in the 2025 legislative session, as the state comes off the $250 million Feeding Our Future fraud scheme. Some measures proposed to combat fraud, such as a statewide Office of Inspector General, came up short, but one of the measures that passed this session was increased whistleblower protections.
Rep. Marion Rarick, R-Maple Lake, said Tuesday that she, alongside other Republican members of the fraud committee, has heard from whistleblowers who allege feeling discouraged in their efforts to come forward with suspected fraud.
“I’m trying to figure out a sensitive way to address this, but we have had whistleblowers from within DHS who have approached us and have alleged that efforts to try to bring impropriety to the attention of the inspector general or the commissioner or higher-ups within DHS has resulted in to one degree or another, discouragement, even retaliation, is a word that’s been thrown around,” she said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gandhi said Tuesday that she has had staff come to her with concerns about fraud before, and that if there is enough “credible evidence” to formally investigate the concerns, she has done so. She added that it is of “paramount importance” to her that her employees feel “safe in reporting any concerns.”